The longtime espresso veteran shares how, with the discharge of the Pico grinder, “espresso perfection” is lastly attainable.
BY DAVID SCHOMER
SPECIAL TO BARISTA MAGAZINE ONLINE
Earlier this 12 months, my longtime dream of pushing espresso right into a constant, repeatable culinary artwork type got here true with the little Pico grinder from La Marzocco. After 37 years of frustration, for the primary time in my life, the accessible gear is just not blocking me utterly—or making it very troublesome—to seduce the attractive perfume of the bean right into a cup.
After I started making espresso in 1987, the espresso machines accessible have been incapable of sustaining steady temperatures through the extraction of the shot. This was a agency barrier to capturing the perfume of the roasted espresso to savor as a style and aroma expertise. (That’s the holy grail: espresso that tastes like the bottom espresso smells.) Drifting temperature made that aromatic promise just about unimaginable. That barrier fell on February 28, 2001, at La Marzocco in the Ballard neighborhood of Seattle. With the assistance of Kent Bakke, John Blackwell, Mark Barnett, Roger Whitman, together with John Bicht of Versalab, the primary PID-controlled espresso machine got here into existence. (See “Brewing Water Temperature ‘Italy Meets Omega,’” in LucidCafe, Might 2001, authored by David Schomer; and “A Transient Historical past of the PID,” by La Marzocco.)
Inside a couple of years, PID management was a regular providing worldwide in trendy espresso machines.
Espresso gear, nevertheless, nonetheless wanted assist. The actually lengthy slog was that of the grinder. I started writing articles 10 years in the past explaining the incorporates a grinder would want to have the ability to produce artisan espresso whereas grinding by the cup:
—No floor espresso shall be chambered within the grinder.
—Floor espresso should be delivered to the portafilter with no high-quality particle drift.
—A conical burr should be pushed on the appropriate RPM to realize perfect fines/coarse ratio.
—Warmth generated by the motor should be managed.
—Dosage should be measured by weight.
La Marzocco has hit the vital options with the Pico, whose options embody RPM, direct dosing with no chambered espresso, and nil fine-particle drift. Grind by weight is non-compulsory for the artisan barista and never but accessible. Warmth management is the large differentiator with this grinder; DIY venting options are attainable. With the discharge of the Pico, I can say that after 37 years, now we have entry to espresso perfection.
A Little Background
On a stroll with my son on Seattle’s Fremont Canal in 1992, I dreamed of a grinder that will be made particularly for grinding every shot freshly, per order. Grinding on demand put a novel pressure on the motor: Early on, I understood that an excessive amount of warmth, generated by turning the motor on and off for every dose, was an issue. However I additionally acknowledged the significance of freshness within the grounds being dosed into the portafilter.
So you may see that the grinder has been an space of fixed analysis for me. To help me on my quest, La Marzocco legend Kent Bakke started importing grinders for me to check starting within the mid-Nineties. Due to this fact, it’s particularly poignant that La Marzocco is the corporate that has lastly solved the dilemma 30 years later.
The Dosing System
The keys to controlling the espresso’s circulate fee are grind integrity mixed with precise coarseness. This leads to exact resistance of the grounds to the pressurized water, due to this fact attaining the proper, oozing extraction.
As a result of the Pico doesn’t retain any floor espresso within the chamber, the powder stays unaffected by moisture alternate with the ambient humidity situations. (See: Chambered Espresso, partly two.)
And the Pico’s dosing system has twin ramps, capturing the espresso downward immediately because it exits the burr set. That is vital: It prevents any micro particle migration inside the powder en path to the portafilter. (See: Particle Management, partly two.)
Ring Burr Drive
The location of the burrs within the jet-style dosing configuration requires the producer to drive the ring burr with the motor. This dramatically will increase the effectivity of the grind, leading to extra taste and thicker crema than the identical burr set driving the cone burr, with the motor on the similar RPM. At the moment the cone burr drive continues to be customary on all conical grinders besides these utilizing jet-style dosing.
RPM
My analysis clearly exhibits there’s a Goldilocks zone (i.e., an excessive amount of, too little, or simply proper) for the RPM when utilizing conical burrs and driving the cone burr with the motor. With the Kony burr (40mm) RPM is about 300. The espresso produced is thick and wealthy, with a satin mouth really feel. I’ve examined grinders turning the conical burr set as little as 150 RPM and the espresso is skinny, like flat burr extractions. Equally, driving the conical burrs at excessive RPMs additionally resulted in skinny pictures.
The Pico is popping the ring burr at 800 RPM, leading to about 17 seconds of grinding time for a 22g dose. Turning at about 300 RPM, the Kony burr’s grinding time is within the 15-second vary. Microscopic analysis revealed a considerably increased share of fines within the powder produced by the Pico than the Kony at 300 RPM. Nevertheless, the rise of fines within the combine that provides you such thick pictures presents its personal challenges for the barista. The Pico calls for vigorous distribution methods to keep away from brewing water channeling by means of the packed espresso.
All my experiments are on grinders turning the cone burr with the motor. Nevertheless, driving the ring burr with the motor is a complete new animal. I’ve no knowledge on the best RPM for the ring burr drive. Nevertheless, the Pico grinder is popping the ring burr at about 800 RPM, leading to a grind time of about 17 seconds for a 20g dose. At 800 RPM, driving the ring burr, the Pico produces a excessive share of fines and delivers them into the portafilter with good constancy. Extra fines within the powder outcomes make it attainable to provide the thickest, most intensely flavorful espresso I’ve ever had.
We’ll launch half two of this text tomorrow.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
David Schomer began Espresso Vivace on April 18, 1988, in Seattle, Washington. From day one, the corporate’s constitution has been to “analysis, develop and promote caffe espresso as a brand new culinary artwork.” David’s printed works embody over 100 articles for espresso commerce magazines, and his sequence of books, which launched in 1996. The sequence can be accessible in Japanese, Korean, and Chinese language. David’s video course Caffe Latte Artwork from 1995 is thought to have impressed the explosion of latte artwork in every single place. David is most generally often known as the daddy of latte artwork. David is at the moment centered on roasting and getting ready his beloved espresso at Espresso Vivace’s two areas in Seattle.
Subscribe and Extra!
As at all times, you may learn Barista Journal in paper by subscribing or ordering a difficulty.
Learn the June + July 2025 Situation at no cost with our digital version.
Without spending a dime entry to greater than 5 years’ value of points, go to our digital version archives right here.
